Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) relatedto sector_t being unsigned, advice requested
From: Hans Reiser
Date: Wed Jan 07 2004 - 04:28:56 EST
- Next message: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: Any changes in Multicast code between 2.4.20 and 2.4.22/23 ? -> New Info"
- Previous message: Yu, Luming: "RE: ACPI battery problem with 2.6.1-rc1-mm2 kernel patch"
- In reply to: Oleg Drokin: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Next in thread: Oleg Drokin: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oleg Drokin wrote:
As for why gcc is finding this, but scripts (e.g. smatch) do not is because
scripts generally know nothing about variable types, so they cannot tell
this comparison was always false (and since gcc can do this for long time
already, there is no point in implementing it in scripts anyway).
can we get gcc to issue us a warning? there might be other stuff
lurking around also....
--
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: Any changes in Multicast code between 2.4.20 and 2.4.22/23 ? -> New Info"
- Previous message: Yu, Luming: "RE: ACPI battery problem with 2.6.1-rc1-mm2 kernel patch"
- In reply to: Oleg Drokin: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Next in thread: Oleg Drokin: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]