Re: kgdb cleanups

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > >>>Hi!
> > >>>
> > >>>No real code changes, but cleanups all over the place. What about
> > >>>applying?
> > >>>
> > >>>Ouch and arch-dependend code is moved to kernel/kgdb.c. I'll probably
> > >>>do x86-64 version so that is rather important.
> > >>>
> > >>>								Pavel
> > >>
> > >>A few comments:
> > >>
> > >>I like the code seperation.  Does it follow what Amit is doing?  It would 
> > >>be nice if Amit's version and this one could come together around this.
> > >>
> > >>I don't think we want to merge the eth and regular kgdb just yet.  I 
> > >>would, however, like to keep eth completly out of the stub.  Possibly a 
> > >>new module which just takes care of steering the I/O to the correct place.
> > >
> > >
> > >I've sent Amit the start of an plug interface for abstracting the
> > >communication layer. Should be relatively painless and allow for
> > >starting sessions on the interface of your choice.
> > >
> > May I see?
> 
> Here's the interface plus the eth side of it:

Does it work with those patches? (Amid's version does not seem to work
over ethernet).
								Pavel


-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/