Re: smp dead lock of io_request_lock/queue_lock patch

[Doug Ledford]

On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 11:04, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 10:52, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > Well, the scsi-dledford-2.4 tree is intended to be someplace I can put
> > all the stuff I'm having to carry forward in our kernels, so that's
> > distinctly different than a driver update only tree.  I could do that
> > separately and I have no problem doing that.
> 
> I'll take that as a "yes" then ;-)
> 
> Thanks for doing this, beacuse I really wasn't looking forward to trying
> to sort it all out.

No problem.  I'll set up a tree later today and start watching for 2.4
driver updates.

> I trust your judgement about this, so it sounds like we have the
> beginnings of a good working model for 2.4

Cool.  I'm good with that.

-- 
  Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>     919-754-3700 x44233
         Red Hat, Inc.
         1801 Varsity Dr.
         Raleigh, NC 27606


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/