Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8

From: Dave Jones
Date: Wed Jan 14 2004 - 10:23:05 EST


On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:06:05PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Part of the justification for cpufreq (at least on x86) was an alternative
> > for when ACPI just doesn't work, or for when folks either don't want to,
> > or can't run ACPI (through various other AML bugs for eg).
>
> Except that the ACPI P-States implementation also uses the cpufreq
> infrastructure.

Sure, but that came later..

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/