Re: [PATCH] some more fixes for inode.c

[Rik van Riel]

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 08:06 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > but I'm not 100% sure we need that change, since
> > maybe only completely unused inodes can end up here. David ?
> 
> No, I don't see any reason why that should be the case; you can get
> iput() called for an inode which happens to have data in the page cache.
> This part of the patch is needed.

OK, thanks for confirming my suspicions.

Marcelo, could you please apply the patch ?

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/