Re: [PATCH 2.6.2-rc1-mm3] fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c

From: Bryan Whitehead
Date: Sun Jan 25 2004 - 16:38:42 EST


Tim Cambrant wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 08:48:59PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote:

This patch keeps the same functionality but removes the warning the compiler generates.


I sent you a patch exactly like this a few days ago, but I don't know
if you got it. This way is a lot more simple than the approach you went
for in your last patch, but it really shouldn't matter at all. All it
does is to clear a warning. One tip though, in SubmittingPatches you
can read that the best way to create patches is by making them apply
with the -p1 flag. This is done by including the actual kernel source
directory when making the diff, such as this:

I didn't get it. Sorry.

diff -up linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c.orig linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c

It doesn't matter what you named your kernel directory, since the -p1 flag
ignores that name. Using this command will improve your chances of getting
your patches included.


Tim Cambrant

In Documentation/SubmittingPatches it says this:

To create a patch for a single file, it is often sufficient to do:

SRCTREE= /devel/linux-2.4
MYFILE= drivers/net/mydriver.c

cd $SRCTREE
cp $MYFILE $MYFILE.orig
vi $MYFILE # make your change
diff -up $MYFILE.orig $MYFILE > /tmp/patch

From the example I am supposed to be in my source tree, not just outside it.

Does the documentation need to be changed? It seems everyone I've sent a patch to would like a patch that looks like "diff -up linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c.orig linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c" instead of "diff -up fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c.orig fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c".

If this is the case I wouldn't mind updating the docs and submitting a patch. ;)

--
Bryan Whitehead
Email:driver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WorkE:driver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/