Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] 2.4.25pre7 warning fix

[john stultz]

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 08:38, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Btw, why do we need cyclone_setup() for !CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT ?
> >
> > /* No-cyclone stubs */
> > #ifndef CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT
> > int __init cyclone_setup(char *str)
> > {
> >         printk(KERN_ERR "cyclone: Kernel not compiled with
> > CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT, cannot use the cyclone-timer.\n");
> >         return 1;
> > }

This is needed because cyclone_setup() is called by
detect_clustered_apic(), which may or may not be done on a kernel w/
CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT enabled. 

> 
> After having a closer look at it I think we should:
> 
> 1. if CONFIG_X86_TSC is set:
>    - make calibrate_tsc() failure a fatal error
>    - assume use_tsc = 1 and x86_udelay_tsc = 1 and optimize them out
>      with preprocessor

Sounds fair. 


> 
> 2. if CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT is _not_ set:
>    - assume use_cyclone = 0 and optimize it out as well.

We already do this. 

>    - cyclone_setup() etc should go out.

cyclone_setup() is still needed. 

> 3. I would rename CONFIG_X86_TSC to something like CONFIG_X86_TSC_FORCE
>    - the current name is misleading. It wouldn't affect .config.

Agreed. 


thanks
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/