Re: [PATCH] [APM] Is this the correct way to fix suspend bug introducedin 2.6.0-test4?

From: Axel Boldt
Date: Thu Jan 29 2004 - 18:01:31 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Which interface: sysfs, proc, devfs?"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.2-rc2"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] [APM] Is this the correct way to fix suspend bug introduced in 2.6.0-test4?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Schierl wrote:

the patch below (against 2.6.1-mm5) fixes my APM problems

And mine as well (Dell Inspiron 5000 laptop).

Axel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Which interface: sysfs, proc, devfs?"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.2-rc2"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] [APM] Is this the correct way to fix suspend bug introduced in 2.6.0-test4?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]