Re: [PATCH] PCI Update for 2.6.3-rc1

From: Greg KH
Date: Mon Feb 09 2004 - 18:51:27 EST


ChangeSet 1.1500.11.11, 2004/02/03 16:22:27-08:00, david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx

[PATCH] PCI: dma_pool fixups


Documentation/DMA-API.txt | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/base/dmapool.c | 6 +--
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


diff -Nru a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
--- a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt Mon Feb 9 14:59:04 2004
+++ b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt Mon Feb 9 14:59:04 2004
@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
To get the pci_ API, you must #include <linux/pci.h>
To get the dma_ API, you must #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>

+
+Part Ia - Using large dma-coherent buffers
+------------------------------------------
+
void *
dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
dma_addr_t *dma_handle, int flag)
@@ -42,6 +46,7 @@
Note: consistent memory can be expensive on some platforms, and the
minimum allocation length may be as big as a page, so you should
consolidate your requests for consistent memory as much as possible.
+The simplest way to do that is to use the dma_pool calls (see below).

The flag parameter (dma_alloc_coherent only) allows the caller to
specify the GFP_ flags (see kmalloc) for the allocation (the
@@ -61,6 +66,79 @@
consistent allocate. cpu_addr must be the virtual address returned by
the consistent allocate

+
+Part Ib - Using small dma-coherent buffers
+------------------------------------------
+
+To get this part of the dma_ API, you must #include <linux/dmapool.h>
+
+Many drivers need lots of small dma-coherent memory regions for DMA
+descriptors or I/O buffers. Rather than allocating in units of a page
+or more using dma_alloc_coherent(), you can use DMA pools. These work
+much like a kmem_cache_t, except that they use the dma-coherent allocator
+not __get_free_pages(). Also, they understand common hardware constraints
+for alignment, like queue heads needing to be aligned on N byte boundaries.
+
+
+ struct dma_pool *
+ dma_pool_create(const char *name, struct device *dev,
+ size_t size, size_t align, size_t alloc);
+
+ struct pci_pool *
+ pci_pool_create(const char *name, struct pci_device *dev,
+ size_t size, size_t align, size_t alloc);
+
+The pool create() routines initialize a pool of dma-coherent buffers
+for use with a given device. It must be called in a context which
+can sleep.
+
+The "name" is for diagnostics (like a kmem_cache_t name); dev and size
+are like what you'd pass to dma_alloc_coherent(). The device's hardware
+alignment requirement for this type of data is "align" (which is expressed
+in bytes, and must be a power of two). If your device has no boundary
+crossing restrictions, pass 0 for alloc; passing 4096 says memory allocated
+from this pool must not cross 4KByte boundaries.
+
+
+ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *pool, int gfp_flags,
+ dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
+
+ void *pci_pool_alloc(struct pci_pool *pool, int gfp_flags,
+ dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
+
+This allocates memory from the pool; the returned memory will meet the size
+and alignment requirements specified at creation time. Pass GFP_ATOMIC to
+prevent blocking, or if it's permitted (not in_interrupt, not holding SMP locks)
+pass GFP_KERNEL to allow blocking. Like dma_alloc_coherent(), this returns
+two values: an address usable by the cpu, and the dma address usable by the
+pool's device.
+
+
+ void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr,
+ dma_addr_t addr);
+
+ void pci_pool_free(struct pci_pool *pool, void *vaddr,
+ dma_addr_t addr);
+
+This puts memory back into the pool. The pool is what was passed to
+the the pool allocation routine; the cpu and dma addresses are what
+were returned when that routine allocated the memory being freed.
+
+
+ void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *pool);
+
+ void pci_pool_destroy(struct pci_pool *pool);
+
+The pool destroy() routines free the resources of the pool. They must be
+called in a context which can sleep. Make sure you've freed all allocated
+memory back to the pool before you destroy it. While pci_pool_destroy()
+may not be called in interrupt context, it's perfectly safe to do that with
+dma_pool_destroy().
+
+
+Part Ic - DMA addressing limitations
+------------------------------------
+
int
dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
int
@@ -86,6 +164,10 @@

Returns: 1 if successful and 0 if not

+
+Part Id - Streaming DMA mappings
+--------------------------------
+
dma_addr_t
dma_map_single(struct device *dev, void *cpu_addr, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
@@ -253,6 +335,7 @@
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL

See also dma_map_single().
+

Part II - Advanced dma_ usage
-----------------------------
diff -Nru a/drivers/base/dmapool.c b/drivers/base/dmapool.c
--- a/drivers/base/dmapool.c Mon Feb 9 14:59:04 2004
+++ b/drivers/base/dmapool.c Mon Feb 9 14:59:04 2004
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
/**
* dma_pool_alloc - get a block of consistent memory
* @pool: dma pool that will produce the block
- * @mem_flags: SLAB_KERNEL or SLAB_ATOMIC
+ * @mem_flags: GFP_* bitmask
* @handle: pointer to dma address of block
*
* This returns the kernel virtual address of a currently unused block,
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
}
}
if (!(page = pool_alloc_page (pool, SLAB_ATOMIC))) {
- if (mem_flags == SLAB_KERNEL) {
+ if (mem_flags & __GFP_WAIT) {
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE (wait, current);

current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
/*
* Resist a temptation to do
* if (!is_page_busy(bpp, page->bitmap)) pool_free_page(pool, page);
- * it is not interrupt safe. Better have empty pages hang around.
+ * Better have a few empty pages hang around.
*/
spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pool->lock, flags);
}

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/