Re: HT CPU handling - 2.6.2

[Hod McWuff]

OK, the BIOS setting is disabled and cannot be changed, so the message
won't get cleaned up that way. I could of course disable SMP in my
kernel, but that really doesn't address anything.

What I'm wondering is, if the second "CPU" appears to exist but is
merely marked disabled, who cares about the BIOS flag? Why couldn't the
disable flag be cleared or ignored?

Couldn't the ACPI/APIC/SMP code just cope with the odd LAPIC ID somehow?

On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 00:37, Len Brown wrote:
> Your BIOS is reporting the 2nd CPU as disabled, and telling us that it
> has LAPIC id 0x81 = 129.  The ACPI table code prints this out and
> registers the processor anyway, but that chokes because the LAPIC ID is
> way out of bounds.
> 
> I'm thinking that ACPI should not register a processor that the BIOS
> marked as disabled...
> 
> What should you do?  Apparently you've got an HT-enabled platform, BIOS,
> and OS, but do not have an HT-enabled processor.  Your choices are to
> disable HT in the BIOS SETUP to clean up this message, or plug in an
> HT-enabled processor.
> 
> cheers,
> -Len
> 
> On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 15:44, Hod McWuff wrote:
> > I've got a 2.0A GHz P4, advertised as non-hyperthread, that seems to
> > be
> > reporting the presence of a second CPU. It also seems to be disabled
> > by
> > setting bit 7 of its ID. I've tried compiling with support for 130
> > CPU's
> > and nothing changed. What would have to be done to get this disabled
> > CPU half back online?
> > 
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug Processor #0 15:2 APIC version 20
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x81]
> > disabled)
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug Processor #129 invalid (max 16)
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
> > Feb  9 04:45:03 pug ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> > 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/