My code fragment has (original multiversion and version in 2.4.24):
/*
* scsi_unregister will be called AFTER we return.
*/
static int adpt_release(struct Scsi_Host *host)
{
adpt_hba* pHba = (adpt_hba*) host->hostdata[0];
// adpt_i2o_quiesce_hba(pHba);
adpt_i2o_delete_hba(pHba);
return 0;
}
So I am unsure as to how *that* (the scsi_unregister call) got in there
in the 2.6.3 stream. adpt_i2o_queisce was commented out in version 2.4.5
of the driver (Prior to the `historical documents' and at least the
in-box driver for RH7.3). It was not part of the 2.6.2 tree I based my
patch on and not part of the submitted 2.6 patch for the dpt_i2o driver.
adpt_i2o_quiesce tells the adapter to stop all activity, including
builds, and is a blocking command with a 4 minute timeout.
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-----Original Message-----
From: David Lang [mailto:david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:24 AM
To: Salyzyn, Mark; Jaco Kroon
Cc: Adrian Bunk; Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: Re: 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile
Mark, do you have any comments on this?
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Jaco Kroon wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 01:28:14 -0800try
From: Jaco Kroon <jkroon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: David Lang <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.3 adaptec I2O will not compile
David Lang wrote:
I received a post from Mark Salyzyn with a new driver that doescompile,
he said that he has submitted the patches (I didn't get a chance to
onderhewig.the new kernel yet, I expect to do that shortly and will report anySomebody just mailed me a patch too, but I found the following
problems)
D
discrepancy:
/*
* scsi_unregister will be called AFTER we return.
*/
static int adpt_release(struct Scsi_Host *host)
{
adpt_hba* pHba = (adpt_hba*) host->hostdata[0];
// adpt_i2o_quiesce_hba(pHba);
adpt_i2o_delete_hba(pHba);
scsi_unregister(host);
return 0;
}
This is used to release the host, now read the comment, and then the
line just before the return. This line was added by the patch, which
also commented out the quiesce line. Is it possible to get any
confirmation on how this is supposed to function?
Jaco
===========================================
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer. Please refer
to www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ for full
details.
Hierdie boodskap en aanhangsels is aan 'n vrywaringsklousule
Volledige besonderhede is by
www.it.up.ac.za/documentation/governance/disclaimer/ beskikbaar.
===========================================
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature