Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:31:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >Hello.  The following interdiff kills kgdb_serial in favor of function
> > > >names.  This only adds a weak function for kgdb_flush_io, and documents
> > > >when it would need to be provided.
> > > 
> > > It looks like you are also dumping any notion of building a kernel that can 
> > > choose which method of communication to use for kgdb at run time.  Is this 
> > > so?
> > 
> > Yes, as this is how Andrew suggested we do it.  It becomes quite ugly if
> > you try and allow for any 2 of 3 methods.
> 
> I do not think that having kgdb_serial is so ugly. Are there any other
> uglyness associated with that?

More precisely:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/2/11/224

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/