Re: [PATCH 2.6] USB_GADGET depends on USB

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:27:40AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:57:56PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > Up to current cset it's possible to select USB_GADGET even if USB is
> > disabled (causing only compilation errors). This patch adds depends
> > rules to disallow USB_GADGET if USB is not enabled (similar to those
> > found in other drivers/usb/*/Kconfig files).
> 
> But why would you want to do that?  You can have a box with USB gadget
> support but not USB "host" support on it just fine.
> 
> This patch is not correct, nor needed.

Now I know, David Brownell already explained it to me.

It was because make (old)config) asks questions about USB_GADGET,
USB_ETH, USB_FILE_STORAGE, USB_G_SERIAL, USB_ZERO, USB_GADGETFS even on
platforms where no USB peripheral controller is available (like sparc32) -
which make no sense as none of them can be built without any
CONFIG_USB_GADGET_*.
These options could be omitted on such platforms...


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/
PLD Team        http://www.pld-linux.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/