Re: [Announce] Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 802.11b driver
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wed Mar 10 2004 - 12:28:15 EST
Timothy Miller wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
vda wrote:
*FLAME ALERT*
/me is slowly getting mad about his prism54 11g hardware
and its firmware, with neither firmware authors nor documentation
for this pile of silicon crap nowhere in sight
What's so cool about having binary firmware? Bugs are bugs,
and you won't be able to even see bugs, less fix, in it.
I don't like being at the mercy of firmware authors.
Well that's typical in wireless, unfortunately. Certain parts of
wireless are political tennis balls with the US govt. and FCC.
Sometimes "put it in firmware" is the only way get ever get open
source drivers at all :/
I'll pick firmware over no-driver any day.
Hmmm... As you may know, I'm a chip designer...
Are there not open specs on the wireless protocols? Could we not design
our own open-source wireless network hardware? What would the US
government have to say about an open-source implementation? Are there
patents which would impede us?
These are honest questions, but with all due respect, I would rather not
dive further into the mess :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/