Re: ACPI PM Timer vs. C1 halt issue

[Prakash K. Cheemplavam]

> That said, I don't know what caused the regression you describe. 
> Perhaps you can clarfiy the minimal changes necessary to switch between
> correct and incorrect behaviour?

Or in short word:

HOT:
Detected 2204.949 MHz processor.
Using pmtmr for high-res timesource

COOL:
Detected 2205.177 MHz processor.
Using tsc for high-res timesource


Otherwise no difference in config.

Prakash

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/