Re: 2.6.4-mm1

From: Mike Fedyk
Date: Thu Mar 11 2004 - 14:30:44 EST


jlnance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:31:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

This affects I/O scheduling potentially quite significantly. It is no
longer the case that the kernel will submit pages for I/O in the order in
which the application dirtied them. We instead submit them in file-offset
order all the time.


Hi Andrew,
I have a feeling this change might significantly improve the external
sorting benchmark I emailed you ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/12/20/46 ).
I will try running it when I get a chance and let you know. It gives me
a good excuse to get 2.6 kernels working on my systems :-)

Hmm, what is happening with Roger Luethi's work lately?

Have there been any patches for use once in this case?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/