Re: [PATCH] 2.6.4-rc2-mm1: vm-split-active-lists

[Nick Piggin]

Mark_H_Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Not too sure what you mean. If we've swapped out the pages, it is
> > because we need the memory for something else. So no.
>
> Actually - no, from what Andrew said, the system was not under memory
> pressure and did not need the memory for something else. The swapping
> occurred "just because". In that case, it would be better to keep track
> of where the pages came from (i.e., swap them in from the free list).

In Linux, all reclaim is driven by a memory shortage. Often it
is just because more memory is being requested for more file
cache.

My patch does make it a bit more probable that process memory will
be swapped out before file cache is discarded.

> Don't get me wrong - that behavior may be the "right thing" from an
> overall performance standpoint. A little extra disk I/O when the system
> is relatively idle may provide needed reserve (free pages) for when the
> system gets busy again.
>
>
> > One thing you could do is re read swapped pages when you have
> > plenty of free memory and the disks are idle.
> That may also be a good idea. However, if you keep a mapping between
> pages on the "free list" and those in the swap file / partition, you
> do not actually have to do the disk I/O to accomplish that.

But presumably if you are running into memory pressure, you really
will need to free those free list pages, requiring the page to be
read from disk when it is used again.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/