Re: [PATCH] klibc update

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Tue Mar 16 2004 - 15:20:03 EST


On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:53:40AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >>Note that it isn't my intention to become klibc maintainer... just in
> > >>case anybody started getting ideas... :)
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought hpa was the klibc maintainer, you're just offering a patch to
> > > add it to the build :)
> >
> > Right... I meant I am not going to become the maintainer of said
> > patch/BK tree :)
>
> It would be rather handy if someone could maintain the definitive tree for
> this work for a while, until we linusify it.
>
> I don't have a feeling for its stability/readiness/desirability/anthingelse
> at this stage. How mergeable is it?

I need to dig through the build system once more.
Last time I did it, I only managed to get it to the 'working' stage.
Not at the 'good enough' stage.

This minor issue should not delay the inclusion though - just a
note that something needs to be looked at in this area.

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/