Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]

[Michael Frank]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:46:28 +1200, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 18:22, Michael Frank wrote:
> > Error messages should be handled on a seperate VT eliminating the issue.
>
> While I definitely like the idea, I'm not sure that's feasible; as Pavel
> pointed out, Suspend doesn't generate all the error messages that might
> possibly appear. Maybe I'm just ignorant.. I'll take a look when I get
> the change.

printk is central and could do the switch when swsusp is active

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/