Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]

From: Michael Frank
Date: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 02:37:42 EST

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:46:28 +1200, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 18:22, Michael Frank wrote:
Error messages should be handled on a seperate VT eliminating the issue.

While I definitely like the idea, I'm not sure that's feasible; as Pavel
pointed out, Suspend doesn't generate all the error messages that might
possibly appear. Maybe I'm just ignorant.. I'll take a look when I get
the change.

printk is central and could do the switch when swsusp is active

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at