RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl
From: Chen, Kenneth W
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 14:23:05 EST
>>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM
> I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard
> set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior,
> in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For
> example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If
> folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it.
Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme?
I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/