Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 17:53:26 EST
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:31:53PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Well IANAL, but it seems not so cut-n-dried, at least.
> Firmware is a program that executes on another processor, so no linking
> is taking place at all. It is analagous to shipping a binary-only
> program in your initrd, IMO.
My point in this mail was a bit "besides the main firmware discussion":
I was not asking whether it's OK to ship this file in the kernel
sources, I was asking whether the contents of the file is really under
the GPL as stated in the header of this file if it contains this binary
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/