Re: finding out the value of HZ from userspace
From: Peter Williams
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 18:27:35 EST
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Peter Williams wrote:
Will this be USER_HZ or kernel HZ?
Someone earlier suggested it would be USER_HZ which would make it
It has to be whatever enables user space to correctly interpret values
sent to user space as "ticks". That means USER_HZ and it's not useless
as it enables USER_HZ to be different and/or change without breaking
programs that use values expressed in "ticks".
It is, however, useless for the _other_ reasons userspace needs to
know kernel HZ, including as I mentioned userspace timer granularity.
Theoretically, which I know can be a pain, user space timer granularity
should be in USER_HZ as, theoretically, this is the only one user space
is supposed to know about. Because of this, in my view, HZ and USER_HZ
should be the same or USER_HZ should be greater than HZ.
(Btw, that usage would be better as a period rather than a frequency,
so that a "tickless" kernel can report zero).
_SC_CLK_TCK is a POSIX.1 definition and can't be changed. But I don't
think that there's any impediment to adding new parameters that can be
reported by sysconf().
The fundamental problem is that there are two values, and both values
have programs which can usefully use them.
How hard can it be to export both?
Making HZ == USER_HZ would also solve the problem.
Dr Peter Williams, Chief Scientist peterw@xxxxxxxxxx
Aurema Pty Limited Tel:+61 2 9698 2322
PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia Fax:+61 2 9699 9174
79 Myrtle Street, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia http://www.aurema.com
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/