Re: Fw: potential /dev/urandom scalability improvement

From: David Mosberger
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 00:26:16 EST

>>>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:15:32 -0600, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:

Matt> Ok, previous observation made no sense; I should really be taking a
Matt> nap right now. Hopefully this next one will make more sense: it ought
Matt> to be ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp as the zero-byte spinlock struct
Matt> still forces alignment.

Makes tons of sense, agreed.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at