Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
From: John Bradford
Date: Sat Mar 27 2004 - 08:22:40 EST
Quote from John Hasler <john@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> John Bradford writes:
> > Then why didn't the original programmer leave a patch space to allow for
> > such modifications? Surely that could be considered part of the
> > 'preferred form'.
> It would be the 'preferred form' if and only if it's the form in which he
> wrote it, patch space or no.
But does 'preferred form' == 'the form it was written in' necessarily
apply for things like assembler? My example about leaving a patch
space wasn't really serious, I was just using it to demonstrate that
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/