Re: [discuss] Re: [CFT] inflate.c rework arch testing needed
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 02:29:13 EST
> The code for new versions of zlib is significantly scarier last I
> checked and there's no particular advantage to it. But one of the
> primary motivations here is to get to the point where something like
> bunzip2 or even a new zlib is a drop-in replacement.
Some people want fast-but-not-big-ratio compressor for speeding up swsusp.
If compressors are drop-in, thats very good.
64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/