Re: [PATCH] nodemask_t x86_64 changes [5/7]
From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Mon Mar 29 2004 - 00:39:52 EST
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:08:46PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> For big endian, ~0UL << NR_CPUS_UNDEF is right. For little endian, it
> depends on how you represent an incomplete bit map. Is it represented
> as a pure bit string, i.e. as if the arch were big endian? Or is it
> represented as a mapping onto the bytes of the underlying long?
Bitmaps are represented in Linux in such manners as befit wrong
(little) endian machines. I suggest shifting in the opposite direction.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/