Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Mar 29 2004 - 07:59:21 EST
> > Kernel could automagically select the right one.. But I'd prefer for
> > only "non compressed" part to reach mainline for 2.6. Feature freeze
> You shouldn't be to extreme in you eagerness to trim things. You should
> always take in mind what would be good for the user, not only the
We are trying to merge into stable series. "Good for developer"
takes priority here. And likely patching compression in is easier
than patching swsusp2+compression....
64 bytes from 184.108.40.206: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/