Re: Kernel support for peer-to-peer protection models...
From: Ivan Godard
Date: Tue Mar 30 2004 - 10:24:38 EST
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@xxxxxxx>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ivan Godard" <igodard@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: Kernel support for peer-to-peer protection models...
> > > > Overall it sounds like your architecture is not very well suited to
> > > > run Linux.
> > >
> > > We believe we can adopt the Linux protection model (i.e. the 386
> > > model) with no more work than any other port to a new architectire
> > Just FYI - Linux has been ported to several architectures with similar
> > capabilities in hardware (IA64 or ppc64 on iseries) and they have all
opted to use
> > an conventional protection model.
> It might be actually plus for Ivan: if ia64 and ppc64 benefit from
> changes for mill, it makes them more acceptable.
Interesting point. Although it's not clear how long ia64 will still exist.
Remember the Alpha?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/