Re: [PATCH] mask ADT: new mask.h file [2/22]
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Tue Mar 30 2004 - 19:16:30 EST
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 4:16 pm, Ray Bryant wrote:
> So, assuming all of the above is correct, I guess I am willing to remove
> the call by reference requirement that I was harping on so much last
> Jesse do you agree?
Yeah, that's fine by me. Given what I've seen, it doesn't look like the
bitmap manipulation routines need to be particularly speedy--certainly not
for sn2 specific code, so I'm ok with just about any implementation so long
as it supports >64p and >64 nodes.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/