Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree

[Hugh Dickins]

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > 
> > Any ideas how we might handle latency from vmtruncate (and
> > try_to_unmap) if using prio_tree with i_shared_lock spinlock?
> 
> I've been thinking about that. My rough plan is to go wild, naked and lockless.
> If we arrange things in the correct order, new entries onto the list would

It's quite easy if there's a list - though I'm not that eager to go wild,
naked and lockless with you!  But what if there's a prio_tree?

Hugh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/