Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree

[Martin J. Bligh]

>> > Any ideas how we might handle latency from vmtruncate (and
>> > try_to_unmap) if using prio_tree with i_shared_lock spinlock?
>> 
>> I've been thinking about that. My rough plan is to go wild, naked and lockless.
>> If we arrange things in the correct order, new entries onto the list would
> 
> It's quite easy if there's a list - though I'm not that eager to go wild,
> naked and lockless with you!  But what if there's a prio_tree?

I still think my list-of-lists patch fixes the original problem, and is
simpler ... I'll try to get it updated, and sent out.

M.,

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/