Re: SATA support merge in 2.4.27

[Andre Hedrick]

Marcelo,

You are suggesting that 2.6 is not stable ?  How could that be ?
Should it not be backported to 2.2 and why not 2.0 ?

What about the rest of the feature sets ?

Necessary? But their is the new and improved called 2.6.
It is time for the old and lousy to quietly wimper off and die.

Regards,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> 
> Marcelo,
> 
> To be RUDELY BLUNT!  When in the hell did it matter in the past?
> 
> Recall your failure to include ATA133 and SATA 1.0 back in 2.4.16-19.
> 
> I actually object to it on the sheer principle of past history.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andre Hedrick
> LAD Storage Consulting Group
> 
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > Jeff Garzik sent me a SATA update to be merged in 2.4.x. 
> > 
> > A lot of new boxes are shipping with SATA-only disks, and its pretty bad
> > to not have a "stable" series without such industry-standard support.
> > 
> > This is the last feature to be merged on 2.4.x, and only because its quite 
> > necessary.
> > 
> > Any oppositions?
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/