Re: sched_domains and Stream benchmark

[Nick Piggin]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I noticed your binary ran with N=2000000 which is only sufficient for a
> > 2 proc 1 MB cache opteron box according to the documentation on the
>
>
> It does not seem to make any difference. 
>
>
> > stream faq.  I also noticed wide variation in results (25% or so) when
> > running with 4 threads on a 4 proc opteron on linux-2.6.5-mm5.  Can you
> > provide me with the specs of the system you ran your tests on?
>
>
> Yes, mm5 is still broken because it has the "tuned to numasaurus" numa
> scheduler. Run it on a standard (non mm*) kernel or with Ingo's early 
> load balance patch.

Now what is wrong with it? I thought you said it is OK
now that Ingo's balance-on-clone is implemented, and
that you also saw similar variation in results with
numasched?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/