Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

[Jorge Bernal (Koke)]

On Martes, 27 de Abril de 2004 21:16, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
>
> I think that /proc/tainted would be better than spamming logs after each
> load of tainted module...
> But probably modules should not be removed from /proc/tainted on unloading
> (to prevent from "un-tainting" the kernel by "clever" users).
>

2 ideas:

Printing if the tainted module is loaded or unloaded

and/or

using the /proc/tainted interface to enable/disable loading of tainted 
modules.

So that are 2 different things: a) how do we handle the tainted mods 
notifications and b) if we let the user decide if he/she wants tainted 
modules to be "blocked"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/