Re: 2.6.6-rc2-bk3 (and earlier?) mount problem (?

[Paul P Komkoff Jr]

Replying to viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 06:05:34PM +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
> > Replying to Grzegorz Kulewski:
> > > But it is strange that I need kernel patch even if I have no evms 
> > > or dm volumes in my system. Can not it be solved in mainstream kernels?
> > > Maybe there should be warning in config help temporaily? Maybe even note 
> > > after option name?
> > 
> > This defect grew up off a disagreement between bdclaim authors and
> > evms authors
> 
> Excuse me?  The damn thing had found nothing.  However, it didn't care
> to release the devices it had claimed - hadn't even closed them, as the
> matter of fact.  That's a clear and obvious bug, regardless of any
> disagreements.

As far as I can see from here, evms parsed partition table, called
dmsetup several times and created corresponding nodes in /dev/evms.

Thus we allowed to mount /dev/evms/hda1 but /dev/hda1 stopped working.
That's why it did not released hda - because it has active devmapper
on top.

> Speaking of the proposed "solutions", how about #4: figure out what,
> when and for how long do they really want to claim and take care to
> release what they don't end up using?

Logic is easy - evms trying to concentrate block device management
into its own hands, but we have in-kernel partitioning code to
consider ...

> WTF is going on there?

:(

-- 
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key
 This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/