Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

[Marc Boucher]

Hi Rik,

Your new proposed message sounds much clearer to the ordinary mortal 
and would imho be a significant improvement. Perhaps printing 
repetitive warnings for identical $MODULE_VENDOR strings could also be 
avoided, taking care of the redundancy/volume problem as well..

Cheers
Marc

On Apr 28, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:

> I wouldn't be averse to changing the text the kernel prints
> when loading a module with an incompatible license. If the
> text "$MOD_FOO: module license '$BLAH' taints kernel." upsets
> the users, it's easy enough to change it.
>
> How about the following?
>
> "Due to $MOD_FOO's license ($BLAH), the Linux kernel community
> cannot resolve problems you may encounter. Please contact
> $MODULE_VENDOR for support issues."
>
>
>
> --
> "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
> Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
> by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/