Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license
From: Marc Boucher
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 15:55:40 EST
On Apr 30, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Marc Boucher wrote:
In contrast, wine was _written_ to do this emulation, so by
definition
any
"bugs" are in wine itself (although I suspect that wine people
sometimes
would prefer it if Office came with sources ;).
The same can be said about DriverLoader.
.. but not abotu the kernel that it depends on.
In other words, if driverloader was a stand-alone project, you could do
whatever the hell you wanted with it.
To clarify this important point, driverloader is a standalone project,
and structured similarly to the HSF driver (all os-specific code is
open-source allowing it to be used with any kernel or even
theoretically any other x86 operating system).
Because only one logical module is loaded, and a single set of tainted
messages bearable, the \0 MODULE_LICENSE() workaround is unnecessary
and not used in driverloader.
Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/