Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

[Tomas Szepe]

On Apr-28 2004, Wed, 01:59 +0200
Robert M. Stockmann <stock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > The needed header files, which need to be read by the gcc compiler, contain
> > > unnamed and annonymizes structures and unions. In the worst case scenario,
> > > only the name of used variables are given and no info about variable type or
> > > size are inside these headers files. gcc-2.95.3 fails to succesfully link these
> > 
> > Opaque types have been available FOREVER.
> 
> sure, but can one qualify that as Open Source?

Are you familiar with my friend "void *"?

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/