Re: [PATCH][2.6]

[Michael Hunold]

Hello Greg,

On 05/05/04 19:53, Greg KH wrote:
> > I think these things are unquestionable and don't make any functional 
> > changes to the code, so this should be applied to 2.6 now.

> Now as in I'll add it to my i2c tree, which will get picked up by -mm
> and let it bake a bit and then pushed to Linus, yes.

This is how I meant it.

Quoting your other mail:

> Looks good, I've applied this to my trees, and it will show up in the
> next -mm release.

Ok, thanks. As my time permits it, I'll prepare patches to add class 
entries to the i2c adapters and i2c clients.

But I won't be sad if the sensors people make the changes to their 
drivers themselves. ;-)

(ie. mostly remove
>	if (!(adapter->class & I2C_CLASS_SMBUS))
>		return 0;
from the xxx_attach_adapter() funtion (the check will be done in the 
i2c-core and add a .class = I2C_CLASS_SMBUS to the xxx_driver static 
variable)

> greg k-h

CU
Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/