Re: [PATCH] Un-inline spinlocks on ppc64
From: Matt Mackall
Date: Sun May 09 2004 - 19:42:46 EST
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:31:44PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> yOn Sun, 9 May 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch below moves the ppc64 spinlocks and rwlocks out of line and
> > > into arch/ppc64/lib/locks.c, and implements _raw_spin_lock_flags for
> > > ppc64.
> > >
> > It included a hunk against include/asm-ppc64/offsets.h, which I dropped.
> Regarding CONFIG_INLINE_SPINLOCKS, could we call it CONFIG_SPINLINE as is
> the current option supported on i386?
Ugh, I've never liked that config name. Let's change it to be the
less clever version, please.
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/