Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement
From: Chris Wedgwood
Date: Mon May 10 2004 - 21:48:15 EST
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 06:17:40PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> According to everyone who uses dnotify it is.
I don't buy that. I have used dnotify and signals where not an issue.
Why is this an issue for others?
> > 3) dnotify cannot easily watch changes for a directory hierarchy
> People don't seem to really care about this one. Alexander Larsson
> has said he doesn't care about it. It might be nice to add in the
I don't know who that is and why it matters.
Without being able to watch a hierarchy, I'm not sure inotify buys
anything that we can't get from dnotify right now though. It's also
> The idea is to encourage use of a user-space daemon that will
> multiplex all requests, so if 5 people want to watch /somedir the
> daemon will only use one watcher in the kernel. The number might be
> too low, but its easily upped.
If you are to use a daemon for this, why no use dnotify?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/