Re: More convenient way to grab hugepage memory
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 02:13:11 EST
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 16:59, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 09:05:50AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > These two global variables do not appear to be used anywhere in this
> > patch?
> > > +static inline unsigned long __do_mmap_pgoff(struct file * file, unsigned long addr,
> > __do_mmap_pgoff seems rather long to be inline?
> Atop my other patch to nuke the unused global variables, here is a patch
> to manually inline __do_mmap_pgoff(), removing the inline usage. Untested.
> Are you sure you want this? #ifdef'ing out the hugetlb case is somewhat
> more digestible with the inline in place, e.g.:
Well, I did the breakup in 2 pieces in the first place for 2 reasons:
- the original patch had some subtle issues with accounting
- do_mmap_pgoff is already such a mess, let's not make it worse
I mean, it's awful to get anything right in this function, especially
the cleanup/exit path, which is why I think it's more maintainable
cut in 2.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/