Re: [PATCH 2/2] Support for VIA PadLock crypto engine
From: Michal Ludvig
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 15:06:31 EST
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The cryptoloop implementation is busted in more than one way, so it is
> > > useless for security needs:
> > Is dm-crypt any better?
> Nope. dm-crypt has same exploitable cryptographic flaws.
Could you be more descriptive?
* A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in.
* Personal homepage - http://www.logix.cz/michal
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/