Re: 2.4.27-pre2: tg3: there's no WARN_ON in 2.4
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 18:11:26 EST
Adrian Bunk wrote:
AFAIR, the -tiny tree already implements some kind of empty
When optimizing for size that way, your suggestion would result in
If there are no side effects, my suggestion produces zero code.
And after a quick view, I haven't seen any WARN_ON users in 2.6 that
seem to rely on side effects.
Then there should be no size difference, either.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/