Re: [patch] kill off PC9800

[Jeff Garzik]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well it's a question of whether we're likely to see increasing demand for
> [pc9800] in the future.  If so then it would be prudent to put some effort into
> fixing it up rather than removing it.
>
> Seems that's not the case.  I don't see a huge rush on this but if after
> this discussion nobody steps up to take care of the code over the next few
> weeks, it's best to remove it.


Although I like deleting things as much as the next guy :) I do have a 
question, to which I haven't come up with a good answer myself:

Should PC9800 be excised en masse, or just toss the obviously broken or 
not-in-any-makefile/Kconfig pieces?

The PC9800 net driver stuff still seems to build, and be sane.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/