how to configure/build a kernel in a separate directory?

From: Robert P. J. Day
Date: Mon Jun 07 2004 - 16:05:50 EST



(i originally posted this to the "make" mailing list, but i figured
someone here *must* have done this before.)

is there an easy way to configure/build one or both of a 2.4 and 2.6
kernel in a totally separate directory from the source directory itself?

i'd like to have a totally pristine ("make mrproper"ed) source tree,
write-protected, readable by all, so that several developers can
independently configure and build their own kernels without stepping on
each other. currently, they all check out their own copy of the source
via CVS, which starts to take up a lot of space.

obviously, it would be great if they could all set up some kind of build
structure where they could do their own configuration and build in their
personal work directories, so that *all* generated results (header files,
object files, etc.) are placed in their work directory -- nothing should
be generated in the kernel source tree itself.

i'm suspecting that, if there are solutions, they will be different from
2.4 to 2.6, so i'll take whatever solutions i can get. others have
suggested using gnu make in combination with "VPATH", but i'm not sure
that's going to work, as VPATH deals strictly with pre-requisites in other
directories, not executable programs like scripts.

rday

p.s. it gets more exciting since developers might want to create a
downloadable image combination of a kernel and root filesystem, so they
might want to have independent copies of
arch/<arch>/boot/images/ramdisk.image.gz, but i'll fight with that when
the time comes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/