Re: [STACK] >3k call path in reiserfs

[Hans Reiser]

Chris Mason wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 14:09, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Unless it is really necessary, or a small code change, I would prefer to 
> > spend our cycles worrying about this in reiser4, because code changes in 
> > V3 are to be avoided if possible.
> >
> > I am open to arguments that it is really necessary.
> >    
>
> It's pretty important, especially when you toss NFS into the call path
> the stack usage can go higher.  The switch to kmalloc will be relatively
> small and by now we're good at testing for schedule bugs.
>
> -chris
>
>
>
>
>  
Performance impact of kmalloc?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/