Re: [PATCH] Permit inode & dentry hash tables to be allocated >MAX_ORDER size

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Jun 11 2004 - 18:17:52 EST


"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We've hit a problem with alignment issues where the start of the zone is
> aligned to 16MB, for instance, and the max grouping is now 256MB. That
> generatates a "warning: wrong zone alignment: it will crash" error (or
> something similar). Andy sent me a patch this morning to throw away
> the lower section, which is much nicer than crashing ... but I'd prefer
> not to throw that RAM away unless we have to.

Confused. Why do we have that test in there at all? We should just toss
the pages one at a time into the buddy list and let the normal coalescing
work it out. That way we'd end up with a single 16MB "page" followed by N
256MB "pages".

> Allocating the big-assed hashes out of bootmem seems much cleaner to me,
> at least ...

Maybe. That code seems fragile and I have premonitions of unhappy arch
maintainers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/