Re: Finalized FPU Crash Fix? [2.2.x]

[Arkadiusz Miskiewicz]

On Thursday 17 of June 2004 18:08, Josh Myer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Is there a general concensus that the one-liner in 2.6.7 is an
> appropriate fix for the FPU hang/crash bug?  I have several machines
> running 2.4.x which require that outside people have shell access.
> Needless to say, I'm somewhat nervous about this problem =)
And how this look in 2.2.x kernels? One guy here tells me that after running 
http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html#toc1the 2.2 
kernel freezes.

Is such fix right one? 2.2.x doesn't crash with it.

Index: SOURCES/kernel-fwait-2.2.patch
diff -u /dev/null SOURCES/kernel-fwait-2.2.patch:1.1
--- /dev/null   Thu Jun 17 15:34:42 2004
+++ SOURCES/kernel-fwait-2.2.patch      Thu Jun 17 15:34:36 2004
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+--- linux-2.2.26/include/asm-i386/processor.h~ Thu Jun 17 17:19:57 2004
++++ linux-2.2.26/include/asm-i386/processor.h  Thu Jun 17 17:32:36 2004
+@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@
+ 
+ #define clear_fpu(tsk) do { \
+       if (tsk->flags & PF_USEDFPU) { \
++              asm volatile("fnclex ; fwait"); \
+               tsk->flags &= ~PF_USEDFPU; \
+               stts(); \
+       } \
-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz     CS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology
arekm.pld-linux.org, 1024/3DB19BBD, JID: arekm.jabber.org, PLD/Linux
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/