Re: ACPI vs. APM - Which is better for desktop and why?

From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Date: Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:39:30 EST


Justin Piszcz wrote:
I have enabled ACPI on my Dell GX1 (Pentium 3/500MHZ) machine and disabled APM, however, what are the benefits of using ACPI over APM?

I am using Kernel 2.6.7

I see ACPI eats up an IRQ and does not share it:

$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 64997374 XT-PIC timer
1: 10 XT-PIC i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
5: 2625 XT-PIC Crystal audio controller
8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
9: 0 XT-PIC acpi
10: 277489 XT-PIC ide2
11: 11465050 XT-PIC ide4, ide5, eth0, eth1, eth2, eth3
12: 58 XT-PIC i8042
14: 307536 XT-PIC ide0
15: 53 XT-PIC ide1
NMI: 0
LOC: 65007290
ERR: 0
MIS: 0

Yep, IRQ 11 is a bit crowded...

I was just about to ask a similar question...
How do I have a better interrupt table (no or less shared intrerupts) with ACPI?

My system (just rebooted) says:
$ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 1434691 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 5158 IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 2 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
14: 8097 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 959 IO-APIC-edge ide1
19: 105118 IO-APIC-level nvidia
20: 17455 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd, eth0, NVidia nForce2
21: 0 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd
22: 16156 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd
NMI: 0 LOC: 1434624 ERR: 0
MIS: 0

The "problem" here might be IRQ 20 when I am using my scanner@4800dpi (USB2.0, Epson GT-X700) writing the output via NFS (through eth0). Will test the numbers some other time.

Kalin.


--
||///_ o *****************************
||//'_/> WWW: http://ThinRope.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/